Abortion

Everyone knows that abortion kills a baby.

When a woman gets pregnant and is married and has been trying to have kids, no one wonders if a cat or a puppy is going to come out months later.  People never ask "What do you think the clump of random cells will turn into?" 

People ask questions like "Do you know if it is a boy or a girl?" (knowing it is a human) and "What name will you give him/her?"

Why?

Because everyone knows that when a woman is pregnant, barring events like a natural miscarriage, and unnatural events like abortion, she is going to give birth to a young human being. 

Even those who are pro-abortion know that the thing growing inside of a pregnant woman is a baby.  There is too much scientific evidence presented to refute that. 

You can tell because the current dialogue around abortion has started to move into "post birth abortion".  (Also known as infanticide).  The same people that tried to use the argument of "for the life of the mother" 50 years ago are now arguing for abortion up to the day of birth and not giving medical care to babies after a failed abortion.  How can you argue that a born baby isn't worthy of life?  Well, it should come as no surprise.  They knew the thing inside the mother was a baby all along.  They have known it was infanticide of a baby inside his/her mother's womb and called it "abortion".  So why would they stop short at the birth canal.

Their real motivations are somewhat complex.  Some see abortion as a way to keep the size of the underclass manageable.  You can see this in the fact that abortion statistics demonstrate a higher level of racial minority abortions and a higher level of poor abortions.  For their philosophy, you need a large enough underclass to keep electing Democrats with the promise of "fixing" the problem, while really not doing anything but perpetuating the problems, but without having a large enough underclass to ever propose and be able to execute a rebellion.

Some see abortion as a way to avoid consequences.  They sell the lie of consequence free sex and the only way to deliver that is abortion and the lie that there are no consequences for sex outside of God's design.  Also in this case, they know it is a child, but see it as a consequence, not a human being.  It is a "drag" on their "lifestyle". 

Some see abortion as a way to free women from the oppression of men.  It is something that only women have a say over, and men are allowed no voice.  You can see this in the double standard.  If a woman wants the child, a man is responsible to support that child for the rest of his life, as he would any other child.  If a woman doesn't want the child, there is nothing that a man can do (legally) to stop a woman from having an abortion.  A man clearly had to be involved in the creation of the child, but that same man gets absolutely no say in what happens, but must bear responsibility for that child.

Everyone knows that abortion kills a baby.